In this guide
Ask what India produces and the answer is mostly services. Ask where Indians work and the answer is still, to a remarkable extent, farms. That mismatch between output and employment is the single most useful fact about the structure of the Indian economy. It explains low farm incomes, the jobs debate, the pressure on manufacturing, and why so much of ESI comes back to productivity.
This guide covers the structure, how it came to be, and the questions it raises for policy.
Three sectors, two shares
| Sector | Includes | Share of output | Share of workers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Agriculture, forestry, fishing, (in some classifications) mining | Smallest | Largest single sector |
| Secondary | Manufacturing, construction, electricity, gas and water | Middle | Middle, with construction a big employer |
| Tertiary | Trade, hotels, transport, communication, finance, real estate, IT, public administration and other services | Largest | Growing, but well below its output share |
In recent years agriculture has contributed a little under a fifth of GVA while employing over two-fifths of workers, according to the national accounts and the Periodic Labour Force Survey.
Worked example: what the gap means for productivity
Use round illustrative numbers: suppose agriculture produces 18% of output with 45% of workers.
- Output per worker in agriculture, relative to the economy's average = 18 ÷ 45 = 0.40.
- Output per worker outside agriculture = 82 ÷ 55 ≈ 1.49 times the average.
- So a non-farm worker produces about 1.49 ÷ 0.40 ≈ 3.7 times as much as a farm worker.
That ratio is the heart of the structural problem. Moving a worker from a farm to a productive non-farm job raises national output even if nothing else changes. This is the Lewis model of development: surplus labour moves from traditional agriculture to a modern sector, and wages and productivity rise.
How India's path differs
The classic pattern, described by Colin Clark and Simon Kuznets, runs from agriculture to industry to services. Most East Asian economies moved large numbers of workers into labour-intensive manufacturing before services took over.
India's path has been different:
- Services grew fastest after the 1980s, especially IT, finance and telecom, which are skill-intensive and employ relatively few of the workers leaving agriculture.
- Manufacturing's share of GVA has stayed broadly flat for decades, in the mid-teens.
- Construction absorbed many workers leaving farms, often in informal, low-security jobs.
Economists such as Dani Rodrik have called the wider global trend premature deindustrialisation: countries reaching the peak of manufacturing employment at lower income levels than earlier industrialisers. The policy debate in India is whether services can carry job creation, or whether a manufacturing push is still needed. Schemes such as Production Linked Incentives (PLI) reflect the second view.
Formal and informal
Two ideas are easily confused, and examiners like the distinction:
| Informal sector | Informal employment |
|---|---|
| Enterprise-based: small, unregistered, usually proprietary or partnership units | Job-based: work without a written contract, paid leave or social security |
| A roadside eatery, a small workshop | Includes the informal sector and contract or casual workers in formal enterprises |
So a contract worker in a large, registered factory with no provident fund cover is in informal employment in the formal sector. The great majority of India's workers are informally employed.
Formalisation has been pushed through GST registration, digital payments, EPFO coverage, the e-Shram portal for unorganised workers, and the four labour codes (wages, industrial relations, social security, and occupational safety), passed in 2019–20.
From the planning era to NITI Aayog
- 1948 and 1956: Industrial Policy Resolutions. The 1956 resolution divided industries into three schedules and gave the public sector the "commanding heights".
- 1950: the Planning Commission was set up by a government resolution. The First Plan (1951–56) focused on agriculture; the Second Plan (1956–61), based on the Mahalanobis model, pushed heavy industry.
- 1966–69: a "plan holiday" of annual plans after war, drought and a balance-of-payments strain.
- 1969 and 1980: nationalisation of 14 and then 6 major commercial banks.
- 2015: NITI Aayog replaced the Planning Commission on 1 January 2015. It is a policy think tank that promotes cooperative federalism; unlike the Planning Commission, it does not allocate funds to states.
- 2017: the Twelfth Plan, the last Five-Year Plan, ended.
The 1991 reforms
The crisis
By mid-1991 India faced a balance-of-payments crisis. Years of large fiscal deficits, rising external debt, and the oil price spike and loss of remittances during the Gulf War left foreign exchange reserves enough for only a few weeks of imports. Credit ratings were cut, and gold was pledged abroad to raise emergency funds, alongside IMF support.
The response
| Area | Before 1991 | After 1991 |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial licensing | Required for most industries | Abolished except for a short list (New Industrial Policy, July 1991) |
| Public sector | Reserved many industries | Reserved list cut sharply; disinvestment began |
| Foreign investment | Tightly restricted | Automatic approval for FDI up to 51% in many industries, widened over time |
| Trade | High tariffs, import licensing | Tariffs reduced, quantitative restrictions phased out |
| Exchange rate | Officially administered | Devaluation in 1991; market-determined rate from 1993; current account convertibility in 1994 |
| Finance | Administered interest rates, high reserve ratios | Narasimham Committee reforms: lower SLR and CRR, deregulated rates, prudential norms |
| Foreign exchange law | FERA, 1973 | FEMA, 1999 |
This is often summarised as LPG: liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation. The short-term goal was stabilisation; the long-term goal was structural reform towards a more competitive, open economy.
Structural challenges today
- Productivity: low output per worker in agriculture and in the many very small enterprises.
- Jobs: creating enough productive, formal jobs for a young workforce.
- Women's work: female labour force participation is low by international standards, though it has risen in recent PLFS rounds.
- Manufacturing: a flat share of output despite repeated policy pushes.
- Regional gaps: large differences in per capita income between states.
- Infrastructure and logistics: costs that reduce competitiveness.
Model answer outline (15 marks)
Question: Why has the shift of India's workforce out of agriculture been slower than the shift in output? Suggest measures to speed it up.
- Opening: state the gap between agriculture's share of output and its share of workers; call it the central structural feature.
- Consequence: low output per worker, disguised unemployment, low farm incomes.
- Reasons: a services-led growth path that is skill-intensive; slow growth of labour-intensive manufacturing; skill and education gaps; informality; small firm size; land and labour market frictions; low female participation in non-farm work.
- Measures: labour-intensive manufacturing (textiles, footwear, food processing, electronics assembly); MSME credit and formalisation; skilling linked to industry; rural non-farm jobs and agro-processing; urban infrastructure and housing for migrants; logistics.
- Conclusion: raising productivity inside agriculture matters, but lasting income gains need productive non-farm jobs.
Short model answer (10 marks)
Question: Distinguish between the informal sector and informal employment. Why does the distinction matter for policy?
The informal sector is defined by the enterprise: small, unregistered units, usually run by individuals or partners, such as a roadside eatery or a small workshop. Informal employment is defined by the job: work without a written contract, paid leave or social security, wherever it happens.
The two overlap but are not the same. Almost everyone in the informal sector is informally employed, but many workers in registered, formal enterprises also are, such as contract, casual or agency workers without provident fund cover.
The distinction matters for three reasons. First, formalising firms through registration and GST does not by itself give workers security. Second, social security policy must reach workers in formal firms as well as small ones, which is the aim of portability and universal registration drives such as e-Shram. Third, measuring progress needs both lenses: a rise in registered firms can coexist with stagnant job quality.
Policy should therefore pair enterprise formalisation with worker-level protection.
Practice questions
- NITI Aayog replaced the Planning Commission in which year?
- 2015 (1 January).
- Which Industrial Policy Resolution divided industries into three schedules?
- 1956.
- Current account convertibility of the rupee was introduced in:
- 1994.
- Construction belongs to which sector?
- Secondary.
- The Second Five Year Plan was based on which model?
- The Mahalanobis model, emphasising heavy industry.
- A contract worker in a large registered factory without provident fund or paid leave is best described as:
- Informally employed in the formal sector.
Common mistakes
- Quoting sector shares from memory. They change every year; use the latest official data or describe the gap in words.
- Treating "informal sector" and "informal employment" as the same.
- Describing 1991 only as "LPG". Examiners want the crisis, the specific reforms and their logic.
- Saying NITI Aayog allocates plan funds. It does not.
What to do next
- Redo the productivity calculation with the latest official shares.
- Type the 15-mark answer above in 27 minutes.
- Read the guides on employment and industry and MSMEs, which build directly on this structure.
A note on dates and numbers. Exam patterns, vacancies and schedules change from year to year. Always confirm the current details in the latest notification on the Reserve Bank of India website .
Get the next RBI Grade B guide by email
New guides every week. No spam, unsubscribe any time.