In this guide
Since 2020, CLAT has asked current affairs through passages rather than one-line questions. Many candidates read this as good news: if the answer is in the passage, surely GK becomes a reading test. It does not. The passage gives you a topic and a little context. Most of the marks still come from what you already know about that topic.
Understanding how these passages are built changes how you read them, and how you prepare for them.
The format
The Consortium describes the section as passages of up to about 450 words drawn from news, journalistic sources and other non-fiction writing, with questions that may test legal information or knowledge discussed in or related to the passage. In practice you see several passages, each followed by a handful of questions.
The four question types
| Type | What it asks | Where the answer is |
|---|---|---|
| Direct recall from the passage | "According to the passage, the law was enacted in…" | In the text |
| Blank-filling | The passage has a blank or a coded term ("[1]") and asks what fills it | Background knowledge, with clues in the text |
| Related fact | "The organisation mentioned is headquartered in…" | Background knowledge |
| Concept or implication | "Which principle does the passage refer to?" | Partly text, partly background |
The blank-filling type deserves special attention. A setter takes a real passage and removes a key name: the treaty, the body, the Article, the mission. You then have to identify it from the surrounding description. That is only possible if you know the background well enough to recognise it from its features.
Why background carries so much weight
A passage on the Right to Information Act might say nothing about when the Act was passed or which body hears second appeals. A question might ask both. The passage tells you the topic; your notes supply the answer.
This is why preparation for CLAT GK is really preparation on topics, not headlines. If you know the RTI Act as a topic (year, key timelines, the information commissions, the exemptions), you can answer any passage built on it, whatever the news hook.
A reading method
GK is the fastest section in the paper, and time saved here goes to Legal Reasoning and Logical Reasoning. Try this sequence:
- Read the first two or three lines. Identify the topic: which law, body, treaty or event is this about?
- Glance at the questions. Mark which ones are "according to the passage" and which look like background.
- Answer background questions first if you know them. Many need no further reading.
- Scan the passage for the rest. Look for names, numbers and dates that match the question.
- Move on. Do not reread the whole passage for one doubtful question.
A reasonable target is about 30–40 seconds per question on average. Background questions you know take ten seconds; passage questions take longer.
Elimination on background questions
You will not know everything. When you are unsure:
- Remove the options you know are wrong. If the question is about a UN body in Geneva and one option is Nairobi, you may know UNEP sits there.
- Look for category mismatches. An option that is a statutory body when the passage describes a constitutional one, or a treaty from the wrong decade.
- Weigh the cost of a guess. A wrong answer costs 0.25. If you can eliminate two options confidently, a guess between the other two is a reasonable risk. With no elimination, leave it.
For the arithmetic of guessing, see negative marking in CLAT.
A sample CLAT-style passage
Read the passage, then answer. Some answers are in the text and some are not.
Before 2005, a citizen who wanted to see a government file generally had no enforceable way to demand it. The Official Secrets Act, 1923, and a culture of confidentiality meant that most information was treated as closed unless the government chose to share it. The Supreme Court had held, in a line of cases from the 1970s onwards, that the right to know is part of the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a), but there was no law setting out how a citizen could exercise that right.
The [1], passed in 2005, changed that. It allows any citizen to seek information from a public authority by making a written request to a designated officer. The officer must ordinarily respond within 30 days. Where the information concerns the life or liberty of a person, the time limit is 48 hours. A citizen who is refused, or who gets no reply, can file an appeal within the authority, and a second appeal to an information commission.
The Act applies to public authorities, a term that covers bodies set up by or under the Constitution or a law, and bodies owned, controlled or substantially financed by the government. Whether some organisations, such as political parties, fall within that definition has been a long-running dispute. The Act also requires public authorities to publish a wide range of information on their own, without waiting to be asked, so that citizens need to file fewer requests in the first place.
The law is not unlimited. It lists categories of information that need not be disclosed, including information that would harm the sovereignty and security of the country, Cabinet papers before a decision is taken, and personal information that has no relation to public activity. Even then, the law allows disclosure where the public interest outweighs the harm.
Supporters describe the Act as one of the most widely used transparency laws in the world, and it has been used to expose problems in welfare schemes, public works and recruitment. Critics point to delays at information commissions and to vacancies that leave appeals pending. Amendments to the service conditions of information commissioners have also been debated in Parliament.
Q1. Which of the following fills [1]?
(a) Official Secrets Act (b) Whistle Blowers Protection Act (c) Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act (d) Right to Information Act
Q2. According to the passage, within what time must information concerning a person's life or liberty be supplied?
(a) 24 hours (b) 48 hours (c) 7 days (d) 30 days
Q3. The Supreme Court linked the right to know with which fundamental right?
(a) Article 14 (b) Article 19(1)(a) (c) Article 21 (d) Article 32
Q4. Second appeals under the Act at the Central level are heard by:
(a) the Central Information Commission (b) the Central Vigilance Commission (c) the Lokpal (d) the Supreme Court
Q5. Which of the following is NOT listed in the passage as a ground for withholding information?
(a) Harm to the security of the country (b) Cabinet papers before a decision (c) Commercial confidence of a private company (d) Personal information unrelated to public activity
Answers:
- (d) The description (2005, requests to public authorities, 30 days, information commissions) fits only the RTI Act. This is a blank-filling question answered from background plus clues.
- (b) Stated in the passage.
- (b) Stated in the passage. It is also worth knowing independently.
- (a) Background. The Act sets up the Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions. The CVC deals with vigilance and the Lokpal with corruption complaints.
- (c) The passage lists (a), (b) and (d). The Act does have a commercial-confidence exemption, but the passage does not mention it, and the question asks about the passage. Read question stems carefully.
What this sample teaches
- Two of the five questions (Q1 and Q4) needed background. The rest were reading.
- Q5 shows a trap: outside knowledge can mislead you when the question is limited to the passage.
- Q1 shows the blank-filling style. You identify the law from its features.
Common mistakes
- Reading every passage in full before looking at the questions. It wastes time on detail that no question uses.
- Answering "according to the passage" questions from memory. The stem limits you to the text.
- Guessing without elimination. At −0.25, blind guesses on four options lose marks over a paper.
- Treating GK as trivia. The questions reward understanding of a topic, not isolated facts.
What to do next
- Do three GK passage sets this week and tag each question: passage, background, or blank-filling.
- For every background question you missed, add the fact to your notes under its topic.
- Practise the five-step reading method with a timer.
- Read a current affairs plan for CLAT and a worked current affairs passage.
A note on dates and numbers. Exam patterns, vacancies and schedules change from year to year. Always confirm the current details in the latest notification on the Consortium of National Law Universities website .
Get the next CLAT guide by email
New guides every week. No spam, unsubscribe any time.