In this guide
Reading about RC method helps only up to a point. At some stage you have to sit with a passage, answer the questions, and then see exactly where your reasoning matched the text and where it drifted. That is what this page is for.
Below is an original passage written in the CAT style, followed by a paragraph map, four questions and an explanation of every option, right and wrong. A shorter second passage at the end lets you test the method on your own.
How to use this page
- Set a timer for 7 minutes. That is roughly what one passage with four questions gets in a 40-minute section.
- Read the passage once, carefully. Do not look at the questions first.
- Answer all four questions before reading any explanation.
- Then compare, option by option. For every question, including the ones you got right, check whether your reason matches the one given.
The passage
It is common to blame technology for our distraction, as if our devices had stolen an attention we once possessed in full. The history of complaint suggests otherwise. Writers in earlier centuries worried that newspapers, cheap novels and even the printed book would make serious thought impossible, since readers would skim rather than study. Each complaint had some truth in it, and each generation adapted. What changes over time is not the existence of distraction but its form. Every new medium reorganises what we notice and what we ignore, and every reorganisation looks like a loss to those who grew up with the old one.
This does not mean that nothing is at stake. A printed novel, however absorbing, did not adjust itself to its reader. It could not learn which page held a reader longest and print more pages like it. Some modern tools can do something close to this. They are built to capture attention for its own sake, and they measure their success by the time we spend rather than the value we gain. The concern here is not that attention is lost. It is that attention is being directed by interests other than our own, and directed with a precision no earlier medium possessed.
The usual advice, to use less technology, misses this point. A person who halves their screen time but spends the remaining hours on feeds designed to hold them has changed the quantity of their attention, not its ownership. The more useful question is less whether we are distracted than who decides what we attend to, and whether we can take that decision back.
A map of the passage
Before touching the questions, a strong reader can say what each paragraph does in a few words. Here is the map you should have after one reading.
| Paragraph | Job it does | Key signal |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rejects a common view: distraction is old, only its form changes | "The history of complaint suggests otherwise" |
| 2 | Concedes a real concern: some tools steer attention precisely | "This does not mean that nothing is at stake" |
| 3 | Rejects the usual remedy and states the real question | "misses this point", "The more useful question" |
The structure is a classic CAT shape: a popular view, a correction, a concession, and then the author's own position. The author's view sits in the last sentence of paragraph 2 and the last sentence of paragraph 3. Most questions will test whether you kept those two apart from the view the author rejects in the first line.
Question 1: main idea
Which of the following best expresses the main point of the passage?
(a) Modern technology has destroyed a capacity for attention that earlier generations possessed.
(b) Each new medium reorganises what people notice and what they ignore.
(c) Reducing screen time is the most effective way to protect one's attention.
(d) The central issue is not whether we are distracted but who directs our attention.
Answer: (d). It restates the final sentence, which is where the passage lands.
- (a) is the view the author sets up to reject. "As if our devices had stolen an attention we once possessed in full" is presented as a mistake.
- (b) is true to the passage but too narrow. It is the point of paragraph 1 only, and it leaves out the concern and the conclusion.
- (c) is contradicted. Paragraph 3 says this advice "misses this point".
Question 2: purpose of a detail
The author contrasts modern tools with a printed novel in the second paragraph in order to:
(a) show that what sets some modern tools apart is their ability to adapt to each user.
(b) argue that novels were more absorbing than modern media.
(c) suggest that earlier worries about novels were baseless.
(d) recommend reading printed books as a cure for distraction.
Answer: (a). The novel "did not adjust itself to its reader"; some modern tools "can do something close to this". The contrast isolates adaptation as the new feature.
- (b) misreads "however absorbing". The phrase concedes that novels could absorb readers; it does not rank them against modern media.
- (c) is contradicted by paragraph 1: "Each complaint had some truth in it."
- (d) is a remedy the author never offers. The passage does not recommend any activity.
Question 3: tone
The author's attitude towards modern technology is best described as:
(a) hostile: technology as a whole is an enemy of serious thought.
(b) complacent: worries about distraction are old and can be ignored.
(c) discerning: it rejects blanket blame while pinning down a specific concern.
(d) enthusiastic: new media improve the quality of attention.
Answer: (c). Paragraph 1 rejects the blanket charge; paragraph 2 names a precise worry about tools built to capture attention.
- (a) is too strong. The author criticises "some modern tools", not technology as a whole.
- (b) ignores "This does not mean that nothing is at stake." The author takes the concern seriously.
- (d) has no support anywhere in the passage.
For more on reading attitude, see tone and purpose in CAT RC.
Question 4: application
Which situation best illustrates the concern the author raises?
(a) A reader switches from printed newspapers to news podcasts.
(b) A video app learns which clips keep each user watching longest and shows more of them, whatever the user had meant to watch.
(c) A student halves their daily screen time before an exam.
(d) A college library moves its catalogue online.
Answer: (b). It has both parts of the concern: attention steered by the app's interest, and precision (it learns from each user).
- (a) is only a change of form, which paragraph 1 treats as normal.
- (c) changes quantity, which paragraph 3 says "misses this point".
- (d) is a neutral tool. Nothing in it captures attention for its own sake.
What your errors tell you
| If you got this wrong | The likely cause | What to practise |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | You took the first paragraph, or the rejected view, as the main idea | Write a one-line map before answering (how to read a CAT passage) |
| Q2 | You answered what the detail says instead of why it is there | Ask "what would the paragraph lose without this line?" |
| Q3 | You judged the topic instead of the author's attitude | Underline every evaluative word |
| Q4 | You matched a keyword ("screen time", "reading") instead of the logic | List the features of the idea, then test each option |
Your turn: a timed practice passage
Give yourself 5 minutes for this one.
For most of history, owning a thing meant being able to open it. A farmer could take apart a plough, a household could re-sole a shoe, and many older radios came with a circuit diagram fixed inside the case. Repair was not a hobby but part of ownership. Many modern products are sealed, glued or locked by software, so that the person who owns them cannot fix them without the manufacturer's help. Manufacturers defend this as a matter of safety and quality, and sometimes they are right: a badly repaired battery can be dangerous. But the effect, whatever the intention, is to turn ownership into something closer to a long rental. Campaigns for a "right to repair" are therefore not only about saving money or reducing waste, though they do both. They are an argument about what it means to own something at all.
- The author's main claim is that:
- (a) manufacturers seal products only to increase their profits.
- (b) campaigns for a right to repair raise a basic question about what ownership means.
- (c) repair should be left to trained professionals for safety reasons.
- (d) older products were better made than modern ones.
- The author mentions the battery in order to:
- (a) show that all restrictions on repair are justified.
- (b) prove that home repair is usually dangerous.
- (c) concede that the manufacturers' case is sometimes valid.
- (d) explain how products are sealed.
- The phrase "closer to a long rental" suggests that the owner of a sealed product:
- (a) has less control over it than ownership traditionally implied.
- (b) pays for it in instalments.
- (c) must return it to the manufacturer after a fixed period.
- (d) cannot legally resell it.
Answers:
- (b). The last two sentences state it directly. (a) imputes a single motive; the author says "whatever the intention" and grants a safety case. (c) turns a concession into the thesis. (d) compares build quality, which the passage never discusses.
- (c). "Sometimes they are right" is a concession. (a) is extreme: "sometimes" is not "all". (b) stretches one example into a general rule. (d) is not what the battery example does.
- (a). The owner cannot fix the product without the manufacturer, so control is reduced. (b), (c) and (d) take "rental" literally; the author uses it as a comparison.
What to do next
- Redo the first passage in three days without looking at the explanations, and check that your reasons match.
- For your next ten practice passages, write a three-line map like the one above before answering.
- If Q2 or Q4 caught you, revise RC question types; if an inference option fooled you, work through inference questions.
A note on dates and numbers. Exam patterns, vacancies and schedules change from year to year. Always confirm the current details in the latest notification on the Indian Institutes of Management website .
Get the next CAT guide by email
New guides every week. No spam, unsubscribe any time.